So, what should we do about Blastocystis? What do we want to
know?
I believe the imminent answer to the latter question is
easy: We want to know whether it’s pathogenic, whether we should treat it and
how. But I also think that there are many other interesting aspects of
Blastocystis which are also of broad interest to the general public, namely:
How about the many cases of asymptomatic Blastocystis carriage? What does
Blastocystis do in our guts? Could it have any potentially beneficial impact on
our health?
Given the fact that Blastocystis has not been implicated in any outbreaks (admittedly: I guess that no one actually ever looked for Blastocystis in outbreak investigations... except for me!), I reckon that the chance of it being involved in acute diarrhoea is small. So, in that respect it's very different from the other intestinal protists such as Giardia, Cryptosporidium, Cyclospora, microsporidia, even Entamoeba histolytica. It's actually more reminiscent of helminth infections, which are are often chronic, and when light hardly give rise to symptoms (depending on species that is!).So I'm more thinking along the lines of co-evolution, adaptation, etc.
Maybe future research will call for a shift in paradigm, but
until then I think that we should do what we already can, just at a larger
scale and see where it takes us, namely: